切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肾病研究电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 19 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3216.2015.01.005

所属专题: 文献

专家论坛

常用腹膜透析导管类型及导管相关性并发症
夏天1()   
  1. 1. 300211 天津医科大学第二医院
  • 出版日期:2015-02-28
  • 通信作者: 夏天

Peritoneal dialysis catheter types and catheter-related complications

Tian Xia1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University. Tianjin 300211, China
  • Published:2015-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Tian Xia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xia Tian, Email:
引用本文:

夏天. 常用腹膜透析导管类型及导管相关性并发症[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2015, 04(01): 19-21.

Tian Xia. Peritoneal dialysis catheter types and catheter-related complications[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(01): 19-21.

腹膜透析导管是腹膜透析的重要环节,导管相关性并发症约占腹膜透析转为血液透析原因的20%。不同类型导管由于结构和形状的不同,导致相关性并发症的发生率不同。双袖套较单袖套导管可更好地预防皮肤出口感染和腹膜炎;鹅颈管在预防隧道及皮肤出口感染上优于Tenckhoff直管;导管腹腔段卷曲型与直型比较,漂管及引流障碍的发生率更低。然而,随着透析技术和护理技术的提高,不同类型导管所致相关并发症的发生率均明显下降,已无明显差异。在重视导管类型选择的同时,更应强调皮肤和导管护理的重要性。

The use of catheter plays a critical role in peritoneal dialysis (PD). As many as 20% of the transfer from PD to hemodialysis is due to PD catheter-related complications. The incidence of PD catheter-related complications varies with the different structures and shapes of different catheter types. Double-cuffed catheter is better than single-cuffed catheter in reducing the rates of exit-site infection and peritonitis; Swan neck catheter provides better prevention of exit-site/tunnel infection than straight Tenckhoff catheter; the catheter with coiled intraperitoneal portion is associated with lower incidence of catheter-drifting and drainage-disturbance than the catheter with straight intraperitoneal portion. With the improvement of PD and nursing techniques, however, the incidences of various PD catheter-related complications have all been reduced, with no significant differences between the different types of catheters. Therefore, in addition to the selection of catheters, more attention should be paid to the nursing care of skin and PD catheter.

[1]
Flamgan M, Gokal R. Peritoneal catheters and exit-site practices toward optimum peritoneal access: a review of current development [J]. Perit Dial Int, 2005, 25(2): 132-139.
[2]
Nessim SJ, Bargman JM, Jassal SV. Relationship between double-cuff versus single-cuff peritoneal dialysis catheters and risk of peritonitis [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010, 25(7): 2310-2314.
[3]
Eklurd B, Honkanen E, Kyllonen L, et al. Peritoneal dialysis access: prospective randomized comparison of single-cuff and double-cuff straight Tenckhoff catheters [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1997, 12(12): 2664-2666.
[4]
Strppoli GFM, Tong A, Johnson D, et al. Catheters-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004, 15(10): 2735-2746.
[5]
Wai-Kei Lo, Sing-Leung Lui, Fu-Keung Li, et al. A prospective randomized study on three different peritoneal dialysis catheters [J]. Perit Dial Int, 2003, 23(Suppl 2): S127-S131.
[6]
Yip T, Lui SL, Tse KC, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing Tenckhoff catheters inserted using the triple incision method with standard swan neck catheters [J]. Perit Dial Int, 2010, 30(1): 56-62.
[7]
Li C-L, Cui T-G, Gan H-B, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional swan-neck straight-tip catheters with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck [J]. Perit Dial Int, 2009, 29(3): 278-284.
[8]
Hagen SM, Lafranca JA, IJzermans JNM, et al. A systematic review and mata-analysis of the influence of peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complication rate and catheter survival [J]. Kidney Int, 2014, 85(4): 920-932.
[9]
Nielsen PK, Hemmingsen C, Friis SU, et al. Comparison of straight and curled Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheters implanted by percutaneous technique: a prospective randomized study [J]. Perit Dial Int, 1995, 15(1): 18-21.
[1] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[7] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[10] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[11] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[12] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[13] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[14] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[15] 王涛, 刘静, 高玉伟, 王兴华, 胡秀红, 崔红蕊, 徐保振, 杨洪娟. 抗生素耐药背景下中医药防治腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 340-344.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?