切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肾病研究电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 19 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3216.2015.01.005

所属专题: 文献

专家论坛

常用腹膜透析导管类型及导管相关性并发症
夏天1()   
  1. 1. 300211 天津医科大学第二医院
  • 出版日期:2015-02-28
  • 通信作者: 夏天

Peritoneal dialysis catheter types and catheter-related complications

Tian Xia1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University. Tianjin 300211, China
  • Published:2015-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Tian Xia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xia Tian, Email:
引用本文:

夏天. 常用腹膜透析导管类型及导管相关性并发症[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2015, 04(01): 19-21.

Tian Xia. Peritoneal dialysis catheter types and catheter-related complications[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(01): 19-21.

腹膜透析导管是腹膜透析的重要环节,导管相关性并发症约占腹膜透析转为血液透析原因的20%。不同类型导管由于结构和形状的不同,导致相关性并发症的发生率不同。双袖套较单袖套导管可更好地预防皮肤出口感染和腹膜炎;鹅颈管在预防隧道及皮肤出口感染上优于Tenckhoff直管;导管腹腔段卷曲型与直型比较,漂管及引流障碍的发生率更低。然而,随着透析技术和护理技术的提高,不同类型导管所致相关并发症的发生率均明显下降,已无明显差异。在重视导管类型选择的同时,更应强调皮肤和导管护理的重要性。

The use of catheter plays a critical role in peritoneal dialysis (PD). As many as 20% of the transfer from PD to hemodialysis is due to PD catheter-related complications. The incidence of PD catheter-related complications varies with the different structures and shapes of different catheter types. Double-cuffed catheter is better than single-cuffed catheter in reducing the rates of exit-site infection and peritonitis; Swan neck catheter provides better prevention of exit-site/tunnel infection than straight Tenckhoff catheter; the catheter with coiled intraperitoneal portion is associated with lower incidence of catheter-drifting and drainage-disturbance than the catheter with straight intraperitoneal portion. With the improvement of PD and nursing techniques, however, the incidences of various PD catheter-related complications have all been reduced, with no significant differences between the different types of catheters. Therefore, in addition to the selection of catheters, more attention should be paid to the nursing care of skin and PD catheter.

[1]
Flamgan M, Gokal R. Peritoneal catheters and exit-site practices toward optimum peritoneal access: a review of current development [J]. Perit Dial Int, 2005, 25(2): 132-139.
[2]
Nessim SJ, Bargman JM, Jassal SV. Relationship between double-cuff versus single-cuff peritoneal dialysis catheters and risk of peritonitis [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010, 25(7): 2310-2314.
[3]
Eklurd B, Honkanen E, Kyllonen L, et al. Peritoneal dialysis access: prospective randomized comparison of single-cuff and double-cuff straight Tenckhoff catheters [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1997, 12(12): 2664-2666.
[4]
Strppoli GFM, Tong A, Johnson D, et al. Catheters-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004, 15(10): 2735-2746.
[5]
Wai-Kei Lo, Sing-Leung Lui, Fu-Keung Li, et al. A prospective randomized study on three different peritoneal dialysis catheters [J]. Perit Dial Int, 2003, 23(Suppl 2): S127-S131.
[6]
Yip T, Lui SL, Tse KC, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing Tenckhoff catheters inserted using the triple incision method with standard swan neck catheters [J]. Perit Dial Int, 2010, 30(1): 56-62.
[7]
Li C-L, Cui T-G, Gan H-B, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional swan-neck straight-tip catheters with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck [J]. Perit Dial Int, 2009, 29(3): 278-284.
[8]
Hagen SM, Lafranca JA, IJzermans JNM, et al. A systematic review and mata-analysis of the influence of peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complication rate and catheter survival [J]. Kidney Int, 2014, 85(4): 920-932.
[9]
Nielsen PK, Hemmingsen C, Friis SU, et al. Comparison of straight and curled Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheters implanted by percutaneous technique: a prospective randomized study [J]. Perit Dial Int, 1995, 15(1): 18-21.
[1] 武壮壮, 张晓娟, 史泽洪, 史瑶, 原韶玲. 超声联合乳腺X线摄影及PR、Her-2预测高级别与中低级别乳腺导管原位癌的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 631-635.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[9] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[10] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[11] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[12] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[13] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[14] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[15] 张曦才, 曹先德, 高建萍, 沈大庆, 曹现祥, 郭诗杰, 李凤岳, 肖琳. 免人工肾积水在超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 798-803.
阅读次数
全文


摘要