[8] |
Tielemans C, Madhoun P, Lenaers M, et al. Anaphylactoid reactions during hemodialysis on AN69 membranes in patients receiving ACE inhibitors [J]. Kidney Int, 1990, 38(5): 982-984.
|
[9] |
Doi K, Iwagami M, Yoshida E, et al. Associations of polyethylenimine-coated AN69ST membrane in CRRT with the intensive care outcomes observations from a claims data base from Japan [J]. Blood Purif, 2017, 44(3): 184-192.
|
[10] |
Michikoshi J, Matsumoto S, Miyawaki H, et al. Evaluation of proteins and cells that adsorb to dialysis membranes used in continuous hemodiafiltration: comparison of AN69ST, polymethylmethacrylate, and polysulfone membranes [J]. Blood Purif, 2019, 48(4): 358-367.
|
[11] |
Marshall MR, 张凌, 王敏敏,等. oXiris-内毒素吸附技术的临床应用[J]. 华西医学,2018, 33(7): 797-800.
|
[12] |
Malard B, Lambert C, Kellum JA. In vitro comparison of the adsorption of inflammatory mediators by blood purification devices [J]. Intensive Care Med Exp, 2018, 6(1): 12.
|
[13] |
Bacelar Marques ID, Pinheiro KF, de Freitas do Carmo LP, et al. Anaphylactic reaction induced by a polysulfone/polyvinyl pyrrolidone membrane in the10th session of hemodialysis with the same dialyzer [J]. Hemodial Int, 2011, 15(3): 399-403.
|
[14] |
Ronco C, Clark WR. Haemodialysis membranes [J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2018, 14(6): 394-410.
|
[15] |
Ronco C. The rise of expanded hemodialysis [J]. Blood Purif, 2017, 44(2):Ⅰ-Ⅷ.
|
[16] |
García-Prieto A, Vega A, Linares T, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a medium cut-off dialyser and comparison with other high-flux dialysers in conventional haemodialysis and online haemodiafiltration [J]. Clin Kidney J, 2018, 11(5): 742-746.
|
[17] |
Hulko M, Speidel R, Gauss J, et al. In vitro benchmark of cytokine removal by dialyzers with various permeability profiles [J]. Int J Artif Organs, 2017, 40(11): 615-621.
|
[18] |
Hulko M, Dietrich V, Koch I, et al. Pyrogen retention: comparison of the novel medium cut-off (MCO) membrane with other dialyser membranes [J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 6791.
|
[19] |
Haroon S, Davenport A. Choosing a dialyzer: what clinicians need to know [J]. Hemodial Int, 2018, 22(S2): S65-S74.
|
[20] |
Ronco C, La Manna G. Expanded hemodialysis: a new therapy for a new class of membranes [J]. Contrib Nephrol, 2017, 190: 124-133.
|
[21] |
Liakopoulos V, Roumeliotis S, Zarogiannis S, et al. Oxidative stress in hemodialysis: causative mechanisms, clinical implications, and possible therapeutic interventions [J]. Semin Dial, 2019, 32(1): 58-71.
|
[22] |
Ronco C, Brendolan A, Nalesso F, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial (TRIATHRON1) on a new antithrombogenic hydrophilic dialysis membrane [J]. Int J Artif Organs, 2017, 40(5): 234-239.
|
[23] |
Chanard J, Lavaud S, Randoux C, et al. New insights in dialysis membrane biocompatibility: relevance of adsorption properties and heparin binding [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2003, 18(2): 252-257.
|
[24] |
Fu X, Ning JP. Synthesis and biocompatibility of an argatroban-modified polysulfone membrane that directly inhibits thrombosis [J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2018, 29(5): 66.
|
[25] |
Piroddi M, Pilolli F, Aritomi M, et al. Vitamin E as a functional and biocompatibility modifier of synthetic hemodialyzer membranes: an overview of the literature on vitamin E-modified hemodialyzer membranes [J]. Am J Nephrol, 2012, 35(6): 559-572.
|
[26] |
Sepe V, Gregorini M, Rampino T, et al. Vitamin E-loaded membrane dialyzers reduce hemodialysis inflammaging [J]. BMC Nephrol, 2019, 20(1): 412.
|
[27] |
Huang J, Yi B, Li AM, et al. Effects of vitamin E-coated dialysis membranes on anemia, nutrition and dyslipidemia status in hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis [J]. Ren Fail, 2015, 37(3): 398-407.
|
[28] |
Kiaii M, Aritomi M, Nagase M, et al. Clinical evaluation of performance, biocompatibility, and safety of vitamin E-bonded polysulfone membrane hemodialyzer compared to non-vitamin E-bonded hemodialyzer [J]. J Artif Organs, 2019, 22(4): 307-315.
|
[29] |
Pavlenko D, van Geffen E, van Steenbergen MJ, et al. New low-flux mixed matrix membranes that offer superior removal of protein-bound toxins from human plasma [J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 34429.
|
[30] |
Hill K, Walker SN, Salminen A, et al. Second generation nanoporous silicon nitride membranes for high toxin clearance and small format hemodialysis [J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2020, 9(4): e1900750.
|
[31] |
Li X, Johnson D, Ma W, et al. Modification of nanoporous silicon nitride with stable and functional organic monolayers [J]. Chem Mater, 2017, 29(5): 2294-2302.
|
[32] |
Ahmadi A, Mazooji N, Roozbeh J,et al. Effect of alpha-lipoic acid and vitamin E supplementation on oxidative stress, inflammation, and malnutrition in hemodialysis patients [J]. Iran J Kidney Dis, 2013, 11(6): 461-467.
|
[33] |
Kohlová M, Amorim CG, Araújo A, et al. The biocompatibility and bioactivity of hemodialysis membranes: their impact in end-stage renal disease [J]. J Artif Organs, 2019, 22(1): 14-28.
|
[34] |
Ferraz N, Carlsson DO, Hong J, et al. Haemocompatibility and ion exchange capability of nanocellulose polypyrrole membranes intended for blood purification [J]. J R Soc Interface, 2012, 9(73): 1943-1955.
|
[35] |
Ferraz N, Mihranyan A. Is there a future for electrochemically assisted hemodialysis? Focus on the application of polypyrrole-nanocellulose composites [J]. Nanomedicine (Lond), 2014, 9(7): 1095-1110.
|
[36] |
Zhou S, Nyholm L, Strømme M, et al. Cladophora cellulose: unique biopolymer nanofibrils for emerging energy, environmental, and life science applications [J]. Acc Chem Res, 2019, 52(8): 2232-2243.
|
[37] |
Chevtchik NV, Fedecostante M, Jansen J, et al. Upscaling of a living membrane for bioartificial kidney device [J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2016, 790: 28-35.
|
[38] |
van Gelder MK, Mihaila SM, Jansen J, et al. From portable dialysis to a bioengineered kidney [J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2018, 15(5): 323-336.
|
[39] |
Modi A, Verma SK, Bellare J. Extracellular matrix-coated polyethersulfone-TPGS hollow fiber membranes showing improved biocompatibility and uremic toxins removal for bioartificial kidney application [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2018, 167: 457-467.
|
[40] |
Bonomini M, Pieroni L, Di Liberato L, et al. Examining hemodialyzer membrane performance using proteomic technologies [J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2017, 14: 1-9.
|
[41] |
Salani M, Roy S, Fissell WH 4th. Innovations in wearable and implantable artificial kidneys [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2018, 72(5): 745-751.
|
[1] |
Mineshima M. Optimal design of dialyzers [J]. Contrib Nephrol, 2017, 189: 204-209.
|
[2] |
Piroddi M, Pilolli F, Aritomi M, et al. Vitamin E as a functional and biocompatibility modifier of synthetic hemodialyzer membranes: an overview of the literature on vitamin E-modified hemodialyzer membranes [J]. Am J Nephrol, 2012, 35(6): 559-572.
|
[3] |
Koga Y, Meguro H, Fujieda H, et al. A new hydrophilic polysulfone hemodialysis membrane can prevent platelet-neutrophil interactions and successive neutrophil activation [J]. Int J Artif Organs, 2019, 42(4): 175-181.
|
[4] |
Irfan M, Irfan M, Idris A, et al. Fabrication and performance evaluation of blood compatible hemodialysis membrane using carboxylic multiwall carbon nanotubes and low molecular weight polyvinylpyrrolidone based nanocomposites [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2019, 107(3): 513-525.
|
[5] |
Hoseinpour V, Ghaee A, Vatanpour V, et al. Surface modification of PES membrane via aminolysis and immobilization of carboxymethylcellulose and sulphated carboxymethylcellulose for hemodialysis [J]. Carbohydr Polym, 2018, 188: 37-47.
|
[6] |
Aucella F, Gesuete A, Vigilante M, et al. Adsorption dialysis: from physical principles to clinical applications [J]. Blood Purif, 2013, 35(Suppl 2): 42-47.
|
[7] |
Oshihara W, Fujieda H, Ueno Y. A new poly (methyl methacrylate) membrane dialyzer, NF, with adsorptive and antithrombotic properties [J]. Contrib Nephrol, 2017, 189: 230-236.
|