切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肾病研究电子杂志

中华肾病研究电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 1 -7. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3216.2023.01.001

论著

慢性肾衰竭患者发生抗生素脑病的预测模型的建立和评价
余建峰1, 金劲松2,†(), 龙利1, 徐敏1, 金晟1, 张继波1, 刘浩1   
  1. 1. 430030　武汉，江汉大学附属湖北省第三人民医院肾病科
    2. 430070　武汉，湖北省中医院肾病科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-31 出版日期:2023-02-28
  • 通信作者: 金劲松
  • 基金资助:
    2021年湖北省卫生健康委员会科研项目(ZY2021M071)

Establishment and evaluation of prediction model for antibiotic-associated encephalopathy in patients with chronic renal failure

Jianfeng Yu1, Jinsong Jin2,†(), Li Long1, Min Xu1, Sheng Jin1, Jibo Zhang1, Hao Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Nephrology, Hubei No.3 People′s Hospital Affiliated to Jianghan University, Wuhan 430030
    2. Department of Nephrology, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430070; Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2022-05-31 Published:2023-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Jinsong Jin
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

余建峰, 金劲松, 龙利, 徐敏, 金晟, 张继波, 刘浩. 慢性肾衰竭患者发生抗生素脑病的预测模型的建立和评价[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 1-7.

Jianfeng Yu, Jinsong Jin, Li Long, Min Xu, Sheng Jin, Jibo Zhang, Hao Liu. Establishment and evaluation of prediction model for antibiotic-associated encephalopathy in patients with chronic renal failure[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(01): 1-7.

目的

探讨慢性肾衰竭(CRF)患者发生抗生素相关性脑病(AAE)的危险因素，并建立预测模型。

方法

回顾性分析784例CRF患者的临床资料，所有患者均使用了抗生素治疗，根据患者有无发生AAE，分为AAE组(103例)和非AAE组(681例)，将两组患者有统计学意义的临床指标纳入Logistic回归分析，得出AAE发生的独立危险因素并建立预测模型，并使用列线图展示模型。采用ROC曲线、校准曲线判定该模型的区分度及校准度，使用Bootstrap法对模型进行内部验证。

结果

多变量Logistic回归分析显示，年龄大(OR 1.033, 95%CI: 1.012～1.054)、低血浆白蛋白(OR 0.852, 95%CI：0.802～0.905)、低GFR(OR 0.963, 95%CI：0.940～0.988)、单用β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复方制剂类抗生素(OR 3.827, 95%CI：1.528～9.584)、两种或两种以上抗生素联用(OR 2.913, 95%CI：1.187～7.149)以及抗生素未减量使用(OR 0.343, 95%CI: 0.212～0.553)均为CRF患者发生AAE的独立影响因素。列线图模型的ROC曲线下面积为0.808(95%CI：0.770～0.846)，内部验证C-统计量0.808。

结论

本研究建立的预测模型可对临床上早期识别CRF患者的AAE风险及实施预防性措施提供一定参考价值。

关键词: 慢性肾衰竭, 抗生素相关性脑病, 危险因素, 预测模型
Objective

To explore the risk factors of the occurrence of antibiotic-associated encephalopathy (AAE) in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and establish a prediction model.

Methods

The clinical data of 784 patients with CRF were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients had received treatment of antibiotics. According to whether the patients had AAE or not, they were divided into AAE group (n=103) and non-AAE group (n=681). The clinical indicators with statistical differences between the two groups were included in logistic regression analysis to obtain the independent risk factors of AAE and establish a prediction model which was shown by the nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve were used to assess the discrimination and calibration of the model, and Bootstrap method was used for internal validation.

Results

The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that aging(OR 1.033, 95%CI: 1.012-1.054), low plasma albumin(OR 0.852, 95%CI: 0.802-0.905), low GFR(OR 0.963, 95%CI: 0.940-0.988), separate use of β-lactamase inhibitor compound preparation antibiotic (OR 3.827, 95%CI: 1.528-9.584), combination of two or more antibiotics(OR 2.913, 95%CI: 1.187-7.149), and use of antibiotics without dose reduction (OR 343, 95%CI: 0.212-0.553) were all independent influencing factors for the occurrence of AAE in CRF patients. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the nomogram model was 0.808(95%CI: 0.770-0.846)with an internal verification C-index of 0.808.

Conclusion

The prediction model established in this study may provide some reference value for the early identification of AAE risk and the implementation of preventive measures in CRF.

Key words: Chronic renal failure, Antibiotic-associated encephalopathy, Risk factor, Prediction model
表1 两组患者一般资料及实验室检测指标比较
临床变量 非抗生素脑病组(n＝681) 抗生素脑病组(n＝103) t/χ2值 P值
年龄(岁) 53.06±13.25 60.63±12.48 －5.445 <0.001
男[例(%)] 392(57.6) 58(56.3) 0.057 0.811
BMI(kg/m2) 23.36±2.56 23.19±3.01 0.612 0.540
维持性透析[例(%)] 251(36.9) 37(35.9) 0.034 0.854
感染类型[例(%)]     2.788 0.425
肺部感染 289(42.4) 47(45.6)    
泌尿系感染 232(34.1) 27(26.2)    
皮肤及皮下组织感染 120(17.6) 21(20.4)    
其他 40(5.9) 8(7.8)    
合并高血压[例(%)] 312(45.8) 40(46.2) 1.762 0.184
合并2型糖尿病[例(%)] 301(44.2) 54(52.4) 2.444 0.118
合并脑血管疾病[例(%)] 229(33.6) 47(45.6) 5.652 0.017
血红蛋白(g/L) 97.08±13.19 95.94±10.48 0.836 0.403
血浆白蛋白(g/L) 33.83±5.35 29.80±3.34 10.395 <0.001
GFR[ml/(min·1.73 m2)] 25.07±14.42 17.73±6.72 8.504 <0.001
血钾(mmol/L) 4.46±0.90 4.54±1.17 －0.637 0.525
血钙(mmol/L) 2.04±0.34 2.07±0.30 －1.009 0.313
PCT(ng/ml) 2.66±1.33 2.86±1.13 －1.639 0.103
CO2-CP(mmol/L) 20.35±3.89 20.99±2.96 －1.954 0.052
抗生素使用时间≥7 d[例(%)] 408(59.9) 69(67.0) 1.882 0.170
抗生素使用类别[例(%)]     14.760 0.011
单用头孢菌素类 118(17.3) 17(16.5)    
单用青霉素类 86(12.6) 4(3.9)    
单用喹诺酮类 84(12.3) 13(12.6)    
单用β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复方制剂类 120(17.6) 29(28.2)    
两种或以上抗生素联用 185(27.2) 33(32.0)    
其他 88(12.9) 7(6.8)    
抗生素减量使用[例(%)] 381(55.9) 32(31.1) 22.215 <0.001
表2 自变量赋值
变量 赋值
因变量  
抗生素脑病 否＝0，是＝1
自变量  
脑血管疾病病史 否＝0，是＝1
抗生素使用类别 单用头孢菌素类(Z0＝1，Z1＝0，Z2＝0，Z3＝0，Z4＝0)；单用青霉素类(Z0＝0，Z1＝1，Z2＝0，Z3＝0，Z4＝0)；单用喹诺酮类(Z0＝0，Z1＝0，Z2＝1，Z3＝0，Z4＝0)；单用β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复方制剂类(Z0＝0，Z1＝0，Z2＝0，Z3＝1，Z4＝0)；两种或以上抗生素联用(Z0＝0，Z1＝0，Z2＝0，Z3＝0，Z4＝1)；其他(Z0＝0，Z1＝0，Z2＝0，Z3＝0，Z4＝0)
抗生素是否减量使用 否＝0，是＝1
表3 Logistic回归分析结果
自变量 回归系数 标准误 Wald χ2值 P值 OR值 95%CI
年龄(岁) 0.032 0.010 9.901 0.002 1.033 1.012～1.054
血浆白蛋白(g/L) －0.160 0.031 26.931 <0.001 0.852 0.802～0.905
肾小球滤过率[ml/(min·1.73 m2)] －0.037 0.013 8.533 0.003 0.963 0.940～0.988
抗生素使用类别            
单用头孢菌素类 0.959 0.496 3.736 0.053 2.610 0.987～6.903
单用青霉素类 0.078 0.679 0.013 0.909 1.081 0.285～4.091
单用喹诺酮类 0.827 0.518 2.553 0.110 2.287 0.829～6.307
单用β-内酰胺酶抑制剂 1.342 0.468 8.207 0.004 3.827 1.528～9.584
复方制剂类
两种或以上抗生素联用 1.069 0.458 5.446 0.020 2.913 1.187～7.149
其他a － － － － － －
抗生素减量使用 －1.071 0.244 19.196 <0.001 0.343 0.212～0.553
常量 1.615 1.260 1.643 0.200 5.029  
图1 慢性肾衰竭患者发生抗生素相关性脑病预测模型的列线图注：Points：得分；Total Points：总得分
图2 慢性肾衰竭患者发生抗生素相关性脑病预测模型的受试者工作特征曲线
图3 慢性肾衰竭患者发生抗生素相关性脑病预测模型的校准曲线注：AAE：抗生素相关性脑病；Apparent：参考线；Bias-corrected：校正曲线；Ideal：理想曲线
[1]
Primavera A, Cocito L, Audenino D. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus during cephalosporin therapy [J]. Neuropsychobiology, 2004, 49(4): 218-222.
[2]
Chang YM. Cefepime-induced nonconvulsive status epilepticus as a cause of confusion in an elderly patient [J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2015, 114(3): 290-291.
[3]
Martin TCS, Chow S, Johns ST, et al. Ceftaroline-associated encephalopathy in patients with severe renal impair ment [J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2020, 70(9): 2002-2004.
[4]
Fugate JE, Kalimullah EA, Hocker SE, et al. Cefepime neurotoxicity in the intensive care unit: a cause of severe, underappreciated encephalopathy [J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(6): R264.
[5]
Sonck J, Laureys G, Verbeelen D. The neurotoxicity and safety of treatment with cefepime in patients with renal failure [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2008, 23(3): 966-970.
[6]
张佩殷，黄新忠，范亚平，等. 慢性肾脏病并发抗生素脑病的危险因素及防治[J]. 中国现代医学杂志，2014, 24(15): 90-93.
[7]
龚昌华，叶树位. 终末期肾脏病患者应用头孢他啶后并发抗生素脑病的相关性分析[J]. 中国药房，2015, 26(36): 5083-5084.
[8]
郭爱莉. 头孢菌素致慢性肾衰竭患者抗生素脑病25例回顾性分析[J]. 药物流行病学杂志，2015(4): 228-230.
[9]
Nakagawa R, Sato K, Uesaka Y, et al. Cefepime-induced encephalopathy in end-stage renal disease patients [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2017, 376: 123-128.
[10]
Chow KM, Hui AC, Szeto CC. Neurotoxicity induced by beta-lactam antibiotics: from bench to bedside [J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2005, 24(10): 649-653.
[11]
Garces EO, Andrade de Anzambuja MF, da Silva D, et al. Renal failure is a risk factor for cefepime-induced encephalopathy [J]. J Nephrol, 2008, 21(4): 526-534.
[12]
Zhang J, Huang C, Li H, et al. Antibiotic-induced neurotoxicity in dialysis patients: a retrospective study [J]. Ren Fail, 2013, 35(6): 901-905.
[13]
Kim KB, Kim SM, Park W, et al. Ceftiaxone-induced neurotoxicity: case report, pharmacokinetic considerations, and literature review [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2012, 27(9): 1120-1123.
[14]
Sato Y, Morita H, Wakasugi H, et al. Reversible choreoathetosis after the administration of ceftriaxone sodium in patients with end-stage renal disease [J]. Am J Med Sci, 2010, 340(5): 382-384.
[15]
Tan ML, Tun WWW. Reversible choreoathetosis in a patient with end-stage renal disease from administration of ceftriaxone [J]. Cureus, 2019, 11(9): e5764.
[16]
Suzuki S, Naito S, Numasawa Y, et al. Encephalopathy induced by high plasma and cerebrospinal fluid ceftriaxone concentrations in a hemodialysis patient [J]. Intern Med, 2019, 58(12): 1775-1779.
[17]
Jallon P, Fankhauser L, Du Pasquier R, et al. Severe but reversible encephalopathy associated with cefepime [J]. Neurophysiol Clin, 2000, 30(6): 383-386.
[18]
Guo Y, Shao X, Zhang L, et al. A case of suspected antibiotic-associated encephalopathy in a patient undergoing long-term peritoneal dialysis [J]. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48(5): 300060520924507.
[19]
Lattanzio F, Landi F, Bustacchini S, et al. Geriatric conditions and the risk of adverse drug reactions in older adults: a review [J]. Drug Saf, 2012, 35(Suppl 1): 55-61.
[20]
黄玉斌，李赞东. 国内外头孢吡肟不良反应综述[J]. 中国执业药师，2016，13(5): 32-35.
[21]
Mattappalil A, Mergenhagen KA. Neurotoxicity with antimicrobials in the elderly: a review [J]. Clin Ther, 2014, 36(11): 1489-1511.
[22]
贺瑞萍，郭永英. 抗生素类药物对神经系统的毒性反应[J]. 中国药事，2004, 18(12): 774-775.
[23]
Alkharfy KM, Kellum JA, Frye RF, et al. Effect of ceftazidime on systemic cytokine concentrations in rats [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2000, 44(11): 3217-3219.
[24]
Sunagawa M, Matsumura H, Sumita Y, et al. Structural features resulting in convulsive activity of carbapenem compounds: effect of C-2 side chain [J]. J Antibiot (Tokyo), 1995, 48(5): 408-416.
[25]
De Sarro A, Imperatore C, Mastroeni P, et al. Comparative convulsant potencies of two carbapenem derivatives in C57 and DBA/2 mice [J]. J Pharm Pharmacol, 1995, 47(4): 292-296.
[26]
Weihrauch TR, Köhler H, Höffler D. Cerebral toxicity of penicillins in relation to their hydrophobic character [J]. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol, 1975, 289(1): 55-64.
[27]
唐学文，贾运涛，田晓江，等. 左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星和环丙沙星上市后安全警戒信号的挖掘与评价——基于真实世界不良反应研究[J]. 中国新药杂志，2018, 27(5): 596-602.
[28]
Calandra G, Lydick E, Carrigan J, et al. Factors predisposing to seizures in seriously ill infected patients receiving antibiotics: experience with imipenem/cilastatin [J]. Am J Med, 1988, 84(5): 911-918.
[29]
Chow KM, Szeto CC, Hui AC, et al. Mechanisms of antibiotic neurotoxicity in renal failure [J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2004, 23(3): 213-217.
[30]
Nau R, Sörgel F, Eiffert H. Penetration of drugs through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid/blood-brain barrier for treatment of central nervous system infections [J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2010, 23(4): 858-883.
[31]
Grill MF, Maganti R. Cephalosporin-induced neurotoxicity: clinical manifestations, potential pathogenic mechanisms, and the role of electroencephalographic monitoring [J]. Ann Pharmacother, 2008, 42(12): 1843-1850.
[32]
Huang WT, Hsu YJ, Chu PL, et al. Neurotoxicity associated with standard doses of piperacillin in an elderly patient with renal failure [J]. Infection, 2009, 37(4): 374-376.
[33]
Schliamser SE, Cars O, Norrby SR. Neurotoxicity of beta-lactam antibiotics: predisposing factors and pathogenesis [J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1991, 27(4): 405-425.
[34]
Brouns R, De Deyn PP. Neurological complications in renal failure: a review [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2004, 107(1): 1-16.
[35]
马雁，沈皓. 头孢吡肟致尿毒症维持性血液透析患者抗生素脑病的临床分析[J]. 临床内科杂志，2012, 29(9): 612-613.
[36]
彭梅，汪贤聪，罗凯，等. 尿毒症患者抗生素脑病23例临床分析[J]. 实用医院临床杂志，2012, 9(5): 202-203.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[3] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[4] 屈勤芳, 束方莲. 盆腔器官脱垂患者盆底重建手术后压力性尿失禁发生的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 606-612.
[5] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[6] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[7] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[8] 孙博, 黄旭升, 柏秀娟, 郭艳娥, 陈朝晖, 凌丽, 黄梦杰, 董哲毅. 多模式教学法在CHEPs 培训中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 288-290.
[9] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[10] 孙晗, 于冰, 武侠, 周熙朗. 基于循环肿瘤DNA 甲基化的结直肠癌筛查预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 500-506.
[11] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[12] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
[13] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[14] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
[15] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号

AI
小
编
AI小编
你好！我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编，有什么可以帮您的吗？