Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05): 265-267. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3216.2021.05.005

• Teaching Field • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Role of basic research teaching method in the teaching for standardized trainees of nephrology

Qing Ouyang1, Weicen Liu1, Zhe Feng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Nephrology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Chinese PLA Institute of Nephrology, State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2021-07-16 Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-11-23
  • Contact: Zhe Feng

Abstract:

Objective

The kidney diseases have complicated pathogenesis, diverse clinical manifestations, and relatively abstract pathophysiological processes, making the clinical teaching of the nephrology difficult. This article mainly investigated the role of basic scientific research teaching method in improving the learning effect and clinical ability of standardized trainees of nephrology.

Methods

A total of 40 standardized trainees were selected, who rotated in the Department of Nephrology of PLA General Hospital from March 2018 to March 2021, and were randomly divided into two groups: the control group and the experimental group. The control group (n=20) was taught with the traditional clinical knowledge teaching method, while the experimental group (n=20) was taught with both traditional clinical knowledge teaching method and basic scientific research teaching method. The two groups were tested for theoretical knowledge and case analysis, besides going through questionnaire survey.

Results

Compared with the control group, the experimental group had higher scores in both the theoretical knowledge and the case analysis tests, as well as in learning interest, clinical thinking ability, intention to conduct research activities, and teaching satisfaction.

Conclusion

In the teaching to standardized trainees of nephrology, the basic scientific research teaching method could stimulate learning interest, improve clinical knowledge learning performance and case analysis ability, and enhance the ability to put forward clinical practice-based scientific questions and conduct related researches.

Key words: Medical education, Basic scientific research, Traditional teaching, Standardized training

京ICP 备07035254号-35
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-66937011 E-mail: zhsbyj@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd