切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肾病研究电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (03) : 115 -119. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3216.2013.03.002

专家论坛

急性肾损伤概念和诊断标准的变迁
蔡广研1,(), 卜茹1   
  1. 1.100853 北京,解放军总医院肾脏病科 全军肾脏病研究所 肾脏疾病国家重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2013-06-15
  • 通信作者: 蔡广研

Evolution of definition and diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury

Guang-yan CAI1,(), Ru BU1   

  1. 1.Department of Nephrology, Kidney Institute of Chinese People's Liberation Army, State Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853,China
  • Published:2013-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Guang-yan CAI
引用本文:

蔡广研, 卜茹. 急性肾损伤概念和诊断标准的变迁[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2013, 02(03): 115-119.

Guang-yan CAI, Ru BU. Evolution of definition and diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(03): 115-119.

急性肾损伤(AKI)是临床常见危重病症,发病率逐年增高。以往AKI的定义和诊断无统一标准,文献中AKI的概念及诊断标准有数十种之多,导致其发病率、病死率等流行病学结果存在很大差异,疗效判定也无法比较,影响了AKI诊治水平的提高。自2002年以来,先后提出了AKI的急性透析质量指导组(ADQI)标准、急性肾损伤网络(AKIN)标准及最新的改善肾脏病全球预后(KDIGO)指南,以统一国际上关于AKI的定义及分期标准,这对于早期识别AKI患者起到积极作用。目前仍然以血清肌酐和尿量变化作为AKI的诊断和分期指标,而血清肌酐并非一个敏感指标,不能及时地反映肾功能变化,尿量也易受利尿剂、尿路梗阻等因素影响,二者作为诊断或分期指标,存在一定不足。因此,寻找新的早期、敏感、可靠的肾脏损伤标志物是未来的发展方向。现就AKI定义形成、诊断标准的演变与研究进展进行回顾及展望。

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common clinical critical disorder. Its incidence is increasing gradually. There has been no uniform standard for the definition and diagnosis of AKI since ten years ago, making it difficult to compare the results from different studies. Since 2002, ADQI,AKIN and KDIGO guidelines have been published in succession for the evaluation and management of AKI, respectively. These guidelines have provided the definition and classification of AKI, which are appropriate for defining the epidemiology of AKI and for the design of clinical trials. At present, serum creatinine combined with urine output remains the cornerstone for diagnosing and classifying AKI.However, serum creatinine is not a sensitive index as it can't reflect the change of kidney function in time,and urine output is also susceptible to many factors such as use of diuretics and urinary tract obstruction.Neither of them is perfect as an index for both defining and classifying AKI. Therefore, finding early,sensitive and reliable biomarkers of kidney damage is the future direction of research. In this paper, we have reviewed evolution of the definition, diagnostic criteria, and recent research of AKI.

表1 AKI的RIFLE诊断标准
表2 AKI的AKIN诊断标准(基于RIFLE)
表3 AKI的KDIGO分期标准
1
Coca SG, Singanamala S, Parikh CR. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Kidney Int, 2012, 81(5): 442-448.
2
Bucaloiu ID, Kirchner HL, Norfolk ER, et al. Increased risk of death and de novo chronic kidney disease following reversible acute kidney injury [J]. Kidney Int, 2012, 81(5): 477-485.
3
Chawla LS, Amdur RL, Amodeo S, et al. The severity of acute kidney injury predicts progression to chronic kidney disease [J].Kidney Int, 2011, 79(12): 1361-1369.
4
Smith HW. The Kidney structure and function in health and disease [M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1951: 1005-1042.
5
James M, Bouchard J, Ho J, et al. Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013,61(5): 673-685.
6
Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, et a1. Acute renal failure definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative(ADQI) Group [J]. Crit Care, 2004, 8(4): R204-212.
7
Bell M, Liljestam E, Granath F, et al. Optimal follow-up time after continuous replacement therapy in actual renal failure patients stratified with the RIFIE criteria [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2005, 20(2): 354-360.
8
Lin CY, Chen YC, Tsai FC, et al. RIFLE classification is predictive of short-term prognosis in critically ill patients with acute renal failure supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2006, 21(10): 2867-2873.
9
Bagshaw SM, George C, Dinu I, et al. A multi-centre evaluation of the RIFLE criteria for early acute kidney injury in critically ill patients [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2008, 23(4): 1203-1210.
10
Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Ronco C. Classification of acute kidney injury using RIFLE: what's the purpose? Crit Care Med [J]. 2007,35(8): 1983-1984.
11
Ricci Z, Cruz D, Ronco C. The RIFLE criteria and mortality in acute kidney injury: a systematic review [J]. Kidney Int, 2008,73(5): 538-546.
12
Ostermann M, Chang RW. Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE [J]. Crit Care Med, 2007, 35(8):1837-1843.
13
Joannidis M, Metnitz B, Bauer P, et al. Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients classified by AKIN versus RIFLE using the SAPS 3 database [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2009, 35(10): 1692-1702.
14
Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et a1. Acute Kidney Injury Network:report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury [J]. Crit Care, 2007, 11(2): R31.
15
Thakar CV, Christianson A, Freyberg R, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury in intensive care units: a Veterans Administration study [J]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37(9): 2552-2558.
16
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury [J]. Kidney Int, 2012, 2(1 Suppl): 1-138.
17
Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, et al. KDOQI US Commentary on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013, 61(5): 649-672.
18
Parikh CR, Mishra J, ThIessen, et a1. Urinary IL-l8 is an early predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery[J]. Kidney lnt, 2006, 70(1): 199-203.
19
Vaidya VS, Ramirez V, Ichimura T, et al. Urinary kidney injury molecule 1: a sensitive quantitative biomarker for early detection of kidney tubular injury [J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2006,290(2): F517-F529.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[3] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[4] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[5] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[6] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[7] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[8] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[9] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[10] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[11] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[12] 杨菲, 刘腾飞, 赵志军, 李睿聪, 张颉, 刘妍, 赵珍. 血清维生素水平与分化型甲状腺癌的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 633-640.
[13] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要