对比观察案例教学法与传统教学法在规培生连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)教学中的效果。

纳入2017年3月至2020年3月在解放军总医院肾脏病科重症监护室轮转的56例规培生作为研究对象。观察组(28例)采用案例教学法，对照组(28例)采用传统教学法。两组均由相同教师授课，使用相同教材，学时、开设时间均相同。采用理论知识考核与问卷调查方法评价两组的教学效果。采用SPSS22.0软件进行统计学分析。

观察组规培生的学习兴趣、自主学习能力、理解能力、协作能力、课堂活跃度、对教学效果的满意度，以及出科考核成绩均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。

在规培生CRRT教学中应用案例教学法效果较好，值得推广应用。

To compare the effects between the case-based learning method and the traditional learning method in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) teaching to the physicians of the standardized training.

56 physicians of standardized training were included, who were having their rotations in the intensive care unit of the Department of Nephrology of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from March 2017 to March 2020. The observation group (28 physicians) was teached with the case-based learning method, while the control group (28 physicians) was teached with the traditional learning method. The two groups were taught by the same teacher with the same textbooks, the same class hours, and the same starting time. The teaching effects of the two groups were evaluated with both the theoretical knowledge examination and the questionnaire survey. Statistical analysis was carried out with the SPSS22.0 software.

The learning interest, independent learning ability, understanding ability, collaboration ability, classroom activity, and satisfaction with teaching effect, as well as the final examination results of physicians in the observation group were all significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05).

In CRRT teaching to the physicians of the standardized training, the case-based learning method had a better effect, and may be worthy of popularization and application.